Assessment in Technology Rich Classrooms: Accountability through EPortfolios

Educators can insure a comprehensive and an in-depth accountability of each student’s progress toward specified standards through the use of eportfolios (electronic portfolios) that are a student’s self-selected purposeful limited collection of evidence toward the progress of a standard.

 

Teachers realize that eportfolios show accountability since the eportfolios focus on the teacher, school, district, state or national standard. A ninth grade English teacher may structure the eportfolio around the four New York State English Language Arts Standards. The teacher decides which of the standards and which of the subcomponents the students will be responsible for.

 

Educators use eportfolios since they usually are very comprehensive. The New York State English Language Arts (NYS ELA) 11th grade Regents may only briefly measure three out of four standards while an eportfolio can measure all four.

 

Not only are eportfolios comprehensive but they can show more in-depth work than a final or state benchmark. The NYS ELA Regents only four standards-based tasks. Based on the teachers’ expectations, the students may have to include evidence of many different subcomponents of any one standard or they may have to provide several examples of a particular subcomponent.

 

Students develop life long skills in accountability as they do eportfolios since they select which of their work best document their own progress. The teachers select the standards and the subcomponents and the students select which of their many already done works or artifacts they will use for their documentation. The evidence is not prescribed by the teacher. Students are accountable for their own documentation and the selection of which work provides greater accountability for the students.

 

Students show their ability to understand their teachers’ criticism of their work and to make the indicated changes in eportfolios. The students can demonstrate their changes through such techniques as a different color coding for their changes or by labeling their changes on the side of a project. They can do side by side comparisons of the original work and their thought-out revisions. They see their own growth in very obvious ways.

 

Likewise, students demonstrate accountability by reflecting on their work for each standard. Often students use a modified KWL which is KLW; they state what they knew before, what they learned about this standard, and what more they want to learn about it. Their reflections demonstrate their ability to be accountable for their own learning.

 

Some teachers use eportfolios as ongoing accountability during the year. Students periodically review their eportfolios such as on a quarterly basis to decide if they have better evidence for any given standard; if so, they put in the new evidence.

 

Students who know what they have to include in their eportfolio will see class work, assignments, and projects as contributing to a bigger picture of learning. They focus on the standards. They think of the quality of work they have already done and decide if they need to do better in future projects.

 

Teachers often use an eportfolio as a final since the eportfolio provides a comprehensive and in-depth accountability for the standards. This thorough assessment provides a better picture of student learning than an on-demand two hour final. Also, since the teachers have already seen the original work and the revisions, the teachers focus on the reflections to see what the students have identified as their learning and areas for improvement’s students have already done most of the work, with the exception of the reflections, that will be included in the eportfolio during the year so their final task is to compile the eportfolio.

 

Educators usually include in the eportfolio template a summary page in which they provide a rating and brief comment for each standard for the student. This summary page provides the next year’s teachers with a solid base line on the students’ progress toward the standards.

 

Teachers have a choice about what eportfolio media they want to use. They can use general programs such as word processing, PowerPoint, webpages, or linking programs. They may want to use a non-commercial web-based eportfolio application such as SAKAI/OSP or they can might want to use commercial eportfolio programs such as LiveText or StreamTask. All of these programs will help provide student accountability.

 

When teachers start to use eportfolios in the class, they will want to start small with one standard and decide what different types of evidence they want to see. They will make sure that students do several different examples of these types of evidence as part of their regular classroom work or homework. They will show the students a completed eportfolio and model the reflection process.

 

Students do well on achieving standards when they have the accountability of eportfolios.

 

Advertisements

1 Response to “Assessment in Technology Rich Classrooms: Accountability through EPortfolios”


  1. 1 purdew205 September 22, 2006 at 4:16 pm

    I think that the idea of an electronic portfolio is a drastic improvement from a regular portfolio. When I graduated from high school, everyone was required to submit a completed portfolio of 70 standards. If the portfolio was done poorly or didn’t meet the requirements then the student had to revise it or they didn’t walk at the graduation ceremony.
    I feel that by changing the portfolios to online a lot of trouble could have been avoided. A few portfolios were lost by teachers that were checking the students work over, which would never happen online. In other instances teachers were bogged down with last minute material and could not keep everything organized. Submitting portfolios online would solve all of these problems.
    The only disadvantage I can see to moving portfolios online would be if a piece of work couldn’t be represented online. Pictures could be used to show physical projects, but I feel that pictures don’t give an accurate showing of how much work was put into the project.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




RSS Education with Technology

  • Tech Integration Teacher, What time is it? August 23, 2016
    When someone asks what time it is, that person wants to know the time, not the history of the clock, not how a clock works, and not what other types of clocks there are. Classroom teachers want to help their students improve their academic learning through technology. Sometimes they need help with technology so they go […]
    hgtuttle
  • Curriculum Focus, Not Technology Focus July 28, 2016
    In my public school career I have been a classroom teacher, a technology integration specialist and a technology administrator. In my technology role, I served under the Assistant Superintendent for Instruction. She had a simple mission: Improve students’ academic learning. My mission was equally simple: Improve students’ academic learning through technology […]
    hgtuttle
  • Students React to Digital Badges: Pros, Cons and Interesting June 22, 2016
      ISTE 2016 By Harry Grover Tuttle, Ed. D. College World Language Students’ Preferences Digital Badges – 52%        Paper Certificates – 48% World Language: Can-Do Digital Badges Digital Badges Pro- – Breaks down proficiency more – Shows all badges at once – Is more attractive – Is more appropriate since we use […]
    hgtuttle
  • Digital Badges: Naming the Badge October 29, 2015
    Once teachers have selected what learning and what digital badges (individual or category badges; see previous blog), the teachers encounter another decision. What will they name each badge? Will they use the full name of the Common Core Standard or the national proficiency? For English, under “Speaking and Listening,”will they write out SL.2 “Integrate and […]
    hgtuttle
  • Digital Badges: Better Than Grades? October 19, 2015
    Teachers understand that the grade in a course consists of many different factors such as homework, participation , projects, tests, etc. Blodget observes that sometimes grades reflect attitude, effort, ability and behavior (http://www.academia.edu/9074119/Grading_and_Whether_or_not_Grades_Accurately_Reflect_Student_Achievement). Equally important, a letter […]
    hgtuttle
  • World Language Students Use of Mobile Devices in the Classroom October 5, 2015
    Do world language students use technology n the classroom? Do their  teachers go beyond having their students use technology simply for the drill and practice in vocabulary and grammar? Students can use laptops and mobile devices to hear authentic language, read authentic texts, read tweets about famous performers, see up-to-the-moment culture,  watch video […]
    hgtuttle
  • Digital Badges: Individual or Categorized Learning Badges? September 12, 2015
    The idea of digital badges sounds appealing for the digital children in classes. As teachers start thinking about digital badges, they have to figure out what badges will be awarded. The teachers can award social or academic badges. If teachers decide to use academic badges, then the teachers may base their badges on the Common […]
    hgtuttle
  • English +Common Core +Mobile = Success (ISTE2014 Poster -details) June 30, 2014
    Here are the ten examples I showed at my English + Common Core  + Mobile ISTE 2014 Poster Session: Based on CCSS Anchor Statements: L.2 Take a Conventions Mobile Online Quiz  to pick the  incorrect sentence from four choices (capitalization) SL.2  Evaluate audio recording of a  book chapter on mobile and predict for next chapter. […]
    hgtuttle
  • Global Cultural Learning Using Mobile Devices (ISTE Mobile MegaShare Presentation) June 28, 2014
    Based on my presentation at ISTE 2014 Mobile Megashare Why teach about other countries? Location: Large view to small on maps. Culture or culture. Find six similarities in a  mobile picture from another culture (“Wars are caused by differences, not similarities.”-Tuttle.) Tell one piece of information from each different Internet visual from a place in that […]
    hgtuttle
  • English + Common Core + Mobile = Success in Learning Poster Session at ISTE 2014 June 25, 2014
    In my ISTE Sunday 8-10 am poster session, I demonstrate many diverse mobile activities to help students achieve the English Language Arts Common Core Anchor Statements through mobile devices. The mobile activities focus on free common tool apps that are available on both the Android and the iPad. The students use the apps as a seamless […]
    hgtuttle

Blog Stats

  • 742,020 hits

%d bloggers like this: