Eportfolios Show Students’ Proficiency Discrepancies

Recently I watched numerous students show their eportfolios based on the university’s proficiencies. I was very impressed with all the great activities the students showed. I was not impressed by how they proved that they could demonstrate the proficiencies.


In our proficiency on assessment, students will show: many different assessments; pre, during and post assessments; use of assessment data to plan for and adapt instruction for individuals with different needs and abilities; and use of assessment data to plan instruction for groups and whole classes

All the students showed that they knew many different types of assessments and they knew how to use pre, during and post assessments; very few students showed how they used the information gained from these assessments to modify instruction for individuals and to modify instruction for the whole class.


Due to the compact nature of the eportfolio, it was easy to see the discrepancy between knowledge of and understanding the real reason for assessment.

2 Responses to “Eportfolios Show Students’ Proficiency Discrepancies”

  1. 1 Justin Ashworth May 19, 2006 at 10:33 pm


    Without a doubt. I struggled with this when I built my paper-based portfolio in undergrad. Knowing what you’ve done, reflecting on your teaching, and then using that to inform your future teaching is the point of buiding a portfolio in the first place.
    During my time at SU, I had an idea what a portfolio was supposed to be about, but often found myself just talking about what I did rather than thinking about how to use what I learned from certain experiences to inform my future teaching.

    The way students approach building the portfolio and their seriousness and respect (or lackthereof) for the process is another issue in itself.

    I think portfolio based assesment in college needs to take on a whole new meaning for the learner. For example, a professor leaves comments for me on my portfolio in Block one. When it comes time to present for Block two, I should somehow be accountable for proving how I’ve improved on those marked areas. Instead I always experienced that portfolios were approached much like a final exam where students cram, then forget everything afterwards.
    The only thing wrong with that, is that they are going to be spending 25 years in a profession that requires ongoing reflective thinking. We’re feeding way too many inarticulate teachers out into the world, who don’t know what or why they believe in something.


  2. 2 AnJaka July 17, 2006 at 7:50 am

    Great Work!!!
    this is a good link you can refer Art Collection

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

RSS Education with Technology

  • Tech Integration Teacher, What time is it? August 23, 2016
    When someone asks what time it is, that person wants to know the time, not the history of the clock, not how a clock works, and not what other types of clocks there are. Classroom teachers want to help their students improve their academic learning through technology. Sometimes they need help with technology so they go […]
  • Curriculum Focus, Not Technology Focus July 28, 2016
    In my public school career I have been a classroom teacher, a technology integration specialist and a technology administrator. In my technology role, I served under the Assistant Superintendent for Instruction. She had a simple mission: Improve students’ academic learning. My mission was equally simple: Improve students’ academic learning through technology […]
  • Students React to Digital Badges: Pros, Cons and Interesting June 22, 2016
      ISTE 2016 By Harry Grover Tuttle, Ed. D. College World Language Students’ Preferences Digital Badges – 52%        Paper Certificates – 48% World Language: Can-Do Digital Badges Digital Badges Pro- – Breaks down proficiency more – Shows all badges at once – Is more attractive – Is more appropriate since we use […]
  • Digital Badges: Naming the Badge October 29, 2015
    Once teachers have selected what learning and what digital badges (individual or category badges; see previous blog), the teachers encounter another decision. What will they name each badge? Will they use the full name of the Common Core Standard or the national proficiency? For English, under “Speaking and Listening,”will they write out SL.2 “Integrate and […]
  • Digital Badges: Better Than Grades? October 19, 2015
    Teachers understand that the grade in a course consists of many different factors such as homework, participation , projects, tests, etc. Blodget observes that sometimes grades reflect attitude, effort, ability and behavior (http://www.academia.edu/9074119/Grading_and_Whether_or_not_Grades_Accurately_Reflect_Student_Achievement). Equally important, a letter […]
  • World Language Students Use of Mobile Devices in the Classroom October 5, 2015
    Do world language students use technology n the classroom? Do their  teachers go beyond having their students use technology simply for the drill and practice in vocabulary and grammar? Students can use laptops and mobile devices to hear authentic language, read authentic texts, read tweets about famous performers, see up-to-the-moment culture,  watch video […]
  • Digital Badges: Individual or Categorized Learning Badges? September 12, 2015
    The idea of digital badges sounds appealing for the digital children in classes. As teachers start thinking about digital badges, they have to figure out what badges will be awarded. The teachers can award social or academic badges. If teachers decide to use academic badges, then the teachers may base their badges on the Common […]
  • English +Common Core +Mobile = Success (ISTE2014 Poster -details) June 30, 2014
    Here are the ten examples I showed at my English + Common Core  + Mobile ISTE 2014 Poster Session: Based on CCSS Anchor Statements: L.2 Take a Conventions Mobile Online Quiz  to pick the  incorrect sentence from four choices (capitalization) SL.2  Evaluate audio recording of a  book chapter on mobile and predict for next chapter. […]
  • Global Cultural Learning Using Mobile Devices (ISTE Mobile MegaShare Presentation) June 28, 2014
    Based on my presentation at ISTE 2014 Mobile Megashare Why teach about other countries? Location: Large view to small on maps. Culture or culture. Find six similarities in a  mobile picture from another culture (“Wars are caused by differences, not similarities.”-Tuttle.) Tell one piece of information from each different Internet visual from a place in that […]
  • English + Common Core + Mobile = Success in Learning Poster Session at ISTE 2014 June 25, 2014
    In my ISTE Sunday 8-10 am poster session, I demonstrate many diverse mobile activities to help students achieve the English Language Arts Common Core Anchor Statements through mobile devices. The mobile activities focus on free common tool apps that are available on both the Android and the iPad. The students use the apps as a seamless […]

Blog Stats

  • 797,636 hits

%d bloggers like this: