My wife just purchased an all-in-one printer-fax-copier. The machines lists eight special features. However, next to six of the eight features, there is a comment such as “Optional hardware/service needed to utilize this feature.”
I wonder how often we give instruction to students but we have not included the optional features. As I talk and survey students more about their writing, I find out that my assumption that the students already know “how to” or that they remember “how to” are not true. The wonderful lesson of two days ago has not been internalized so that they do not use the new technique; they revert back to the learning gap. Likewise, they face a new writing pattern and they suddenly disregard all the good writing structures they used previously. Finally, they encounter a writing topic that engages them so much that they forget the writing pattern completely. All subject areas have optional features.
As I break the writing process more into thinking units and have the students practice these ways of thinking, I find that optional features need to become part of the standard writing process. I have to be prepared to help the students negotiate their thinking so that they use these features. They have to internalize the formative writing process so that they can produce high quality work at any time and in any condition such as in an in-class writing essay.
How do you build in the options for success for your students?
How valuable is Peer Review?
Published December 15, 2008 Change , Comment , Composition , ELA , Edublogger , Education , English , Feedback , Peer Review , Review , Revision , Writing , peer , write Leave a CommentTags: Change, Comments, Composition, edublooger, Education, English, Essay, Feedback, Improve, peer, Peer Review, Revision, write, Writing
When my students hand in their final English essay, they also hand in their peer reviewed draft. I’ve noticed that usually they do not incorporate the changes that peers suggest.
I gave them a survey on peer review to help me better understand their use of peer’s comments. They admitted that they use very little of peer review.
Some of their reasons:
The reviewer isn’t as smart as I am.
I don’t care what they “feel” about my paper. What is good/bad according to the rubric?
They don’t understand the rubric.
It does not help me when a reviewer finds a mistake if he cannot tell me how to fix it.
They don’t understand my thinking/how I wrote the paper.
The reviewer found some spelling mistakes but missed the big things like my first body paragraph having two topics.
They don’t try/ they do not take it seriously.
How well do your students peer review each other? How valuable is the peer review to the author?
For any one who is interested in implementing formative assessment in the classroom, my book,
Formative Assessment: Responding to Students is available through Eye-on-Education.