When students receive a “C” on an assignment and then an “B” on the next, they know that their grade went up but they do not usually know why. And they probably do not know what new skill or strategy they need to move up to an “A”.
An alternative approach is to use a learning goal based checklist so that students can see the subgoals that they have mastered as a concrete measure of their success. Likewise, they see the subgoals that they have yet to master.
For example, in English, a rubric can be turned into a checklist such as this one for an introductory paragraph
___ Has an attention getter such as a quotation, question, startling statistic, or an anecdote
___ Bridges to the thesis (Makes a connection between the “bigger” attention getter down to the level of the thesis)
___ States the thesis (For a contrast paper, includes the two items to be contrasted and uses a contrast word or phrase)
The teacher marks each item with a plus (proficient) or a minus (working on). Students can easily see what they have been successful on and what they need to improve. Students or peers can assess each others’ work with these easily defined assessment items.
My new book, Successful Student Writing Through Formative Assessment, is available through Eye on Education.

My book, Formative Assessment: Responding to Your Students, is available through Eye on Education.





Formative Assessment and Successful Student Writing Through Formative Assessment by Harry Grover Tuttle



How valuable is Peer Review?
Published December 15, 2008 Change , Comment , Composition , ELA , Edublogger , Education , English , Feedback , Peer Review , Review , Revision , Writing , peer , write Leave a CommentTags: Change, Comments, Composition, edublooger, Education, English, Essay, Feedback, Improve, peer, Peer Review, Revision, write, Writing
When my students hand in their final English essay, they also hand in their peer reviewed draft. I’ve noticed that usually they do not incorporate the changes that peers suggest.
I gave them a survey on peer review to help me better understand their use of peer’s comments. They admitted that they use very little of peer review.
Some of their reasons:
The reviewer isn’t as smart as I am.
I don’t care what they “feel” about my paper. What is good/bad according to the rubric?
They don’t understand the rubric.
It does not help me when a reviewer finds a mistake if he cannot tell me how to fix it.
They don’t understand my thinking/how I wrote the paper.
The reviewer found some spelling mistakes but missed the big things like my first body paragraph having two topics.
They don’t try/ they do not take it seriously.
How well do your students peer review each other? How valuable is the peer review to the author?
For any one who is interested in implementing formative assessment in the classroom, my book,
Formative Assessment: Responding to Students is available through Eye-on-Education.